Nannies Can Be “Mannies”

Comments Off

Libertarian Party Logo
Image via Wikipedia

By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)

Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

ReasonTV, which is a Libertarian sort of space, has a feature they call Nanny Of The Month. But, their nanny is not always a woman, sometimes it is a man or a thing. This month it happens that it is a man and in a sense, a sorry thing. You can decide for yourself, but I’ve decided he needs wheeled into a childrens nursery in a perambulator and beat with a turkey skeleton, er maybe a frozen turkey. What a hero and an elected city official to boot.

Here’s the link to the nanny award on ReasonTV for November 2009.

And thanks to BigGovernment.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Edgewood — Pine Ridge Politics, Episode XXXV

Comments Off

Lum and Abner
Image via Wikipedia

The men talked about stealing the town records in the last episode. It looks like they are going through with filching the records. Let’s listen in and see if they really have larceny in their hearts and minds.

It may be that Pine Ridge politics will never be the same as it was when Lum and Abner came to town.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Slow Down We Said, And We Say It Again

Comments Off

WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 08:  Speaker of the Hou...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)

Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

Charles Krauthammer writing in the Washington Post is not the only voice of reason when it comes to asking the United States Congress to slow down and legislate changes in health care that make sense and will not mire us completely under the muck of a severe depression like the Reid and Pelosi bill is liable to do.  But, he may be the most succinct of all critics of Obamacare.  Mr. Krauthammer, is nothing, if not discerning and astute when it comes to matters of  the economy and just plain common sense. In his article, Kill the bills. Do health reform right, he fills a column or so enumerating the follies of the House bill and the Senate bill.

Mr. Krauthammer begins his article by stating in part:

The fundamental problem with the 2,074-page Senate health-care bill (as with its 2,014-page House counterpart) is that it wildly compounds the complexity by adding hundreds of new provisions, regulations, mandates, committees and other arbitrary bureaucratic inventions.

He continues that there is nothing to bring the components of the bills together and that both depend on political expediency for the string to bind them up. Mentioned in his article are the 118 commissions, boards and other “political” string that must also be bound up to make the pork roast. Mr. Krauthammer slams mandates with financial penalties, which he maintains are,  ”picked out of a hat. He complains of  insurance companies being told what weights to give risk factors (something at which they are quite expert).  And, he speaks to sliding scales, also “picked out of a hat,” that will raise income taxes for the middle class along with other unintended consequences.

Mr. Krauthammer suggest three components for a health care overhaul that aren’t at all mentioned in either the House or Senate bills. Of course there are reasons why they are not mentioned and he does not leave them hanging.  After he trashes both bills by naming them irredeemable, he goes forth to explain why, suggesting the sacrifice of a couple of sacred cows and pigs in the process:

First, tort reform. This is money — the low-end estimate is about half a trillion per decade — wasted in two ways. Part is simply hemorrhaged into the legal system to benefit a few jackpot lawsuit winners and an army of extravagantly rich malpractice lawyers such as John Edwards. [he has much more to say on tort reform and the reader would do well to read his words]

Second, even more simple and simplifying, abolish the prohibition against buying health insurance across state lines. Some states have very few health insurers. Rates are high. So why not allow interstate competition? After all, you can buy oranges across state lines. If you couldn’t, oranges would be extremely expensive in Wisconsin, especially in winter.

But neither bill lifts the prohibition on interstate competition for health insurance. Because this would obviate the need — the excuse — for the public option, which the left wing of the Democratic Party sees (correctly) as the royal road to fully socialized medicine.

His third  component may be the least popular, but it is sure less dangerous and more practical than the silliness that our senators and representatives tell us about actual cost measures in their bills:

Third, tax employer-provided health insurance. This is an accrued inefficiency of 65 years, an accident of World War II wage controls. It creates a $250 billion annual loss of federal revenue — the largest tax break for individuals in the entire federal budget.

This reform is the most difficult to enact, for two reasons. The unions oppose it. And Barack Obama savaged the idea when John McCain proposed it during last year’s campaign.

Mr. Krauthammer ends his piece with a plea to take the issues one by one which amounts to the same thing as saying, “slow down you’re going to fast.” Something said,  over and over. Take the complete article and it makes sense and puts the Senate and House bills where they belong … in the trash bin. Grab the article. And, you don’t have to read th bill … these folks hearthebill.org will read it for you.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Not Much I Like In …

Comments Off

By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009).

Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

In the New York Times, that is. Often, it seems  a whole series of editorials or something much akin to them. I prefer my news  filtered of self-edification and unsupported opinion, but then everyone is guilty of bias in and of the news at some place or many places in their life.

There is an occasional article or series of pieces or maybe some letters that charge me up and cause me to say, “Now that was a dandy and it wasn’t too biased.”  Well, the article found at this link is fun and styled in such a way that one can’t help but follow it to the end. There are arguments to be made and nits to pick about some of the statements  along the paths and byways as the article winds to its end, but all in all, it is fun for children and adults. And if they could read … animals would really like the stories in the piece ….. clickithere it is by Maira Kalman

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

A Thanksgiving Respite

Comments Off

Thanksgiving Day
Image via Wikipedia
By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)

Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

This is a day when I will not bother with a lot of  bloviating and blathering. In short, no musings or commenting, because I will eat turkey, pie and all the other traditional man stuffing things on this day.

I want to wish everyone who passes by or through this blog a very Happy Thanksgiving. I appreciate your being here and I’ll be back.

Thanks,

Chuck

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Edgewood Parks And Recreation Activities Questionnaire

Comments Off

POSTED AS A COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GADABOUT-BLOGALOT

Roger Holden has sent the following:

Please distribute the attached “Things for Kids & Teens to Do,” Questionnaire to friends, family, acquaintances, fellow workers, and return to the town office by 11 December, 2009.

We will be using this information to assess your needs, wants and desires relating to youth activities and help the Parks and Recreation Department focus its attention and energy.

Editor Note: You can access and print a copy of the questionnaire here Questionaire

Roger Holden

Parks and Recreation Program Manager

Town of Edgewood

P.O. Box 3610

Edgewood, NM 87015

Ph: 505-286-4518

Fax: 505-286-4519

parksrec@edgewood-nm.gov

“A society grows great when old men plant trees
whose shade they know they shall never sit in.”
Greek Proverb



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

It’s Everything, But Mostly About Transparency … Or Not

Comments Off

Research. Olin Warner (completed by Herbert Ad...
Image via Wikipedia
By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)

Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

Over at WattsUpWithThat (WUWT) they seem to be having a grand time dealing out nits for the folks crying, “It is getting warm all over the globe.”  The party isn’t about fraud per se, although deceit may enter into the debate.  It seems, the skeptics are more concerned about transparency, or rather, the lack of it. They complain that the so-called fact givers seem not to want their contribution peer-reviewed, except by their team members.

Here’s the first paragraph of the post referenced above on WUWT:

Foreword: Willis asked me to carry this post here. What follows is a long and detailed series of email exchanges that outline the difficult task of getting data so that scientific replication/reproduction can be done by people external to the tight knit group of scientists that make up climate science today.

In a 2006 article two climate investigators published a paper titled: Verification and Validation through Replication: A Case Study Using Axelrod and Hammond’s Ethnocentrism Model. The authors, Rand and Wilensky, writing from Northwestern University complain that climate science research suffers from authentic peer-review since the research information is seldom shared with outside reviewers, nor is it subjected to the rigorous examination it deserves for proper vetting. SOURCE: Anthony Watts writing in WATTSUPWITHTHAT.

The linked article continues with a guest post by Willis Eschenbach. Mr Eschenbach is referred to by some as an “amateur” scientist. I won’t argue with that descriptor because I do not know him or his educational background.  He does however; invite scientists to attack at least one of his “papers,” and you can access the invitation and the paper here. That seems to be much more than some of his detractors are willing to endure with their own research.

The guest post by Willis Eschenbach is valuable if one is to understand some of the very questionable aspects of the research and devious nature of folks at some institutions of higher learning and at least one national laboratory here in the United States.  It is very heartening to see someone  watching the weather seers, even if the watchers can’t get cooperation enough to conduct peer-reviews.

Is there really such a thing as climate “science?”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Special Olympics Equestrian Events Results –Area 5

Comments Off

POSTED AS A COMMUNITY SERVICE BY GADABOUT-BLOGALOT

The link following will take you to a pdf document which displays the information (including event winners and other details) Kathy and Steve Brunson submitted the information: Area 5 results 2009-1

For those interested in obtaining photographs of the event or participants you can order from Frontier Studios. They have posted their information and the images here PHOTOS

Riding For Old Glory

Riding For Old Glory



They Just Keep Falling — ACORNs, That Is

Comments Off

Photo of California Attorney General (and form...
Image via Wikipedia

By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)
Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone

Is there never to be an end to the ignorant tricks that some ACORN offices and employees indulge in through hiding of actions and possible very serious crimes?  Now it is alleged the ACORN office in San Diego attempted to dispose of an estimated 20,000 pages of their office documents. This after Attorney General (AG) Jerry Brown announced on October 1st, he would investigate ACORN and the two young people (James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles) who exposed some of the activities in which ACORN was ready to participate. You can hear an ACORN official speak to AG Brown’s investigation right here

Andrew Breitbart of  BigGovernment.com recently issued what amounts to a challenge to United States Attorney General (USAG) Holder to begin an investigation of ACORN’s alleged crimes and today Mr. Breitbart announced what he refers to as the “evidentiary phase” of his involvement with the scutiny of ACORN’s activities. Quoted below are some of Mr. Breitbart’s remarks concerning the dump of the above mentioned documents:

On October 1, California Attorney General Jerry Brown, who once again aspires to be the state’s governor, announced that he was investigating  not just ACORN in California, but also the truth tellers who exposed the alleged corruption and illegality.

Last night, I hosted a three-hour show on KFI 640 AM, the largest radio  station in the country, and use the opportunity to announce the  existence of 20,000 deeply sensitive and highly political documents  discovered in the dumpster behind ACORN in San Diego on October 9,  nine days after ACORN was announced to be under state investigation.

Some might call that “obstruction of justice.

Mr. Breitbart posted audio links from the three hour radio program he mentions. You can access the audio clips by going to the article which is located here just before the last two paragraphs of the article by Mr. Breitbart. You’ll find the audio astonishing and in some ways unbelievable.

Mr. Breitbart has offered to make available, the documents he has secured, to AG Brown and USAG Holder. Will they accept the offer … not very likely. Wagers?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

FOIA … Department of Labor Just Ignores The Process

Comments Off

By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009)
Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone
According to Don Loos writing at Breitbart.com  the Secretary of Labor (SOL) and her crew seem to care not one iota about their duty to respond to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request. The National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation filed an action in United States District Court on November 20th, asking the court to compel  the SOL to comply with a FOIA  request submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) in April of this year.

According to the suit, the DOL has neither sent the information requested, nor have they indicated when the request is to be honored. FOIA requests under federal law are to be fulfilled within 20 working days or at least, the party served must indicate why it cannot be returned with the requested material. We all remember that President Obama pledged an open and responsive administration and went to pains to record his promise through the United States Department of Justice‘s Office of Information Policy through this memorandum as provided in Mr. Loo’s article:

 

On his first full day in office, January 21, 2009, President Obama issued a memorandum to the heads of all departments and agencies on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The President directed that FOIA “should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails.” Moreover, the President instructed agencies that information should not be withheld merely because “public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears.”
Agencies were directed to respond to requests “promptly and in a spirit of cooperation.” The President also called on agencies to “adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure” and to apply that presumption “to all decisions involving [the] FOIA.” This presumption of disclosure includes taking “affirmative steps to make information public,” and utilizing “modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government.”
It is difficult to determine why DOL has seen fit to ignore the FOIA request and theirPresident’s dictates. Perhaps, the rest of the story will reveal “what evil lurks in the minds of men” … or women. As Mr. Loos continues his story, and if we examine all the documents provided by the links in his story, it probably will not be difficult to see where the rub is. Click here for the rest of the story (see story here). Please click on the link below if you want to fall out of your chair.
WASHINGTON - JANUARY 21:  U.S. President Barac...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Older Entries