By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009 – 2010)
Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone
One might say big smoke and mirrors, but I guess smoke doesn’t always lead to fire … perhaps, just a lot of heat from friction. To those who like or love to file Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests, you’re going to love this account which may instead work its way to the inquiry with a subpoena through theVirginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act.
Whether you like the idea of global warming or climate change which is touted as mostly man- made or not, you’ll enjoy this battle between the forces of give it to me or else, in the person of the Attorney General (AG) of Virginia and the administrators and academics of the University of Virginia (UVa.)
Just what might the AG be looking to grab with his legal filing? Just Michael Mann’s “stuff” according to a guest editorial in the Richmond Times-Dispatch. The editorial, written by Christopher C. Horner, lays the case out quite well for obedience of the legal process, but the UVa folks are digging their heel in to argue:
The University of Virginia indicates it will challenge Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s request for records produced, using taxpayer resources, by former Assistant Professor of Environmental Sciences Michael Mann. This is regrettable. Cuccinelli is following smoke to see if there is fire, prompted by troubling revelations in leaked documents that raise serious questions about Mann’s activities while at the university.
What is it that makes the folks at the UVa believe they can trump the AG? According to the article the argument will be:
UVa’s Faculty Senate has condemned Cuccinelli’s request, calling it a serious infringement upon academic freedom and assault on the freedom of scientific inquiry. It joins a chorus of voices enjoying massive financial support from the taxpayer but who, it seems, believe that this should come without conditions, established by law, which follow the money.
We all remember Michael Mann’s part, or said to be part, in “climategate”. Well the AG’s request or process has to do with this about that:
Despite intense efforts to wave the revelations away, the admissions and code annotations establish, among other things, efforts to “hide the decline” in temperatures, and patch thermometer data on the end of tree ring reconstructions despite admonition by colleagues not to do so for it was improper.
Without implausibly recasting the evidence as a series of misinterpretations, how does the attorney general justify ignoring this mountain of evidence in the public domain?
This story has more twists and turns than a knotted snake and the reader will really get more out of it when he or she is able to see the discretionary prejudice the the UVa tries to exercise. The story is well worth the read, no matter which side of the smoke screen you land on. Choose your beverage and click here , read the editorial and don’t forget the comments. You’ll enjoy both. I promise and you’ll wonder how it all happens the way it happens.
35.061436
-106.191414
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.