By Chuck Ring (GadaboutBlogalot ©2009 -2011
Quote Freely From The Article – Leave The Pseudonym Alone
He is not the first and he is not likely to be the last; but a Nobel Prize wining scientist has opted out of the “warmist” batch and resigned his membership from one of the batch’s organizations. From FoxNews Scitech:
Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, from the premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that “global warming is occurring.”
The official position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man’s actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased emissions of carbon dioxide.
No doubt we are all familiar with the old saw, “never say never.” We have grown to accept the phrase as mostly good advice. The same cannot be said for the word “incontrovertible.” At least, not in the opinion of Giaever, when it applies to global warming and the man caused elements of the claim:
Giaever does not agree — and put it bluntly and succinctly in the subject line of his email, reprinted at Climate Depot, a website devoted to debunking the theory of man-made climate change.
“I resign from APS,” Giaever wrote.
Giaever was cooled to the statement on warming theory by a line claiming that “the evidence is incontrovertible.”
“In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?” he wrote in an email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society.
That worrisome word (incontrovertible) has caused debate in the scientific community before. And why shouldn’t it. The very nature of science seems to always leave the door open to new discoveries and new opinions; but perhaps not so much in the microscopes, thermometers and computer models of the warmists:
“The word ‘incontrovertible’ … is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas. The observational data indicate (sp) a global surface warming of 0.74 °C (+/- 0.18 °C) since the late 19th century.”
The link just below is crying out for the reader to read more and since it was placed there by FoxNews, I’ll leave it there for anyone who wants to check the article in its entirety. Be sure to look for links to related articles below the link
- War of Words Over Global Warming as Nobel Laureate Resigns in Protest (tipggita32.wordpress.com)
- Global Warming leaves some in the cold… (livingjourney.wordpress.com)
- Nobel Prize Winner, Ivar Giaever, Resigns from the American Physical Society Over Global Warming Stance (desmogblog.com)
- More Bad News For Al Gore (thedaleygator.wordpress.com)
- Nobel Winning Physicist Resigns over Gore-ble Warming (constitutionclub.org)
- Thinking Warm on a Cold Day (derpamerica.com)
- Global warming propaganda causes real physicist to refuse to renew membership in APS (junksciencesidebar.com)