week in review After public criticism of a proposal that would let government agencies warrantlessly access Americans’ e-mail, a prominent senator says he will “not support” such an idea.
Sen. Patrick Leahy has abandoned his controversial proposal that would grant government agencies more surveillance power — including warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail accounts — than they possess under current law. The Vermont Democrat said on Twitter that he would “not support such an exception” for warrantless access, a few hours after a CNET article disclosed the existence of the measure.
Leahy’s about-face comes in response to a deluge of criticism, including the American Civil Liberties Union saying that warrants should be required, and the conservative group FreedomWorks launching a petition to Congress — with more than 2,300 messages sent so far — titled: “Tell Congress: Stay Out of My Email!”
Leahy’s proposal would have allowed over 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would have given the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.
• Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants
- About-face on e-mail surveillance bill
- Fury erupts over Sen. Patrick Leahy’s bill on email privacy; Update: Leahy scraps bill?
- Did Sen. Leahy already flip-flop on his warrantless e-mail surveillance bill?
- Senator Dismisses Report That Proposed Bill Would Allow Warrantless Email Surveillance
- Sen. Patrick Leahy rewrites ECPA to allow Federal Law Enforcement to search Email without warrant
- Sen. Leahy Drops Controversial Warrantless E-mail Surveillance Bill
- Leahy scuttles his warrantless e-mail surveillance bill
Copyrights and the Fair Use Doctrine
Gadabout-blogalot.com does not claim any copyright ownership to the websites or other links on this website. – The only purposes for featuring these websites on Gadabout-blogalot.com are (a) to expand the collective human knowledge base by sharing important information, and (b) to enhance our country by highlighting important issues. We believe we are doing this in the spirit of the copyright owners’ original public upload, which was made to a major global video-sharing website, and which was enabled for embedding on external websites such as Gadabout-blogalot.com.
If you own the copyright reflected on this website, and would like us to remove it, please email us.
17 USC 107 ? FAIR USE DOCTRINE: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or photo records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include?
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.