Dad Arrested … Daughter Appalled

Fair Use Notice

The following comes from Eagle Rising and is writen by:

By Onan Coca / 10 May 2014

The daughter of a New Hampshire man who was arrested while protesting the school board’s decision to require High School students to read a book which contains sexually explicit material spoke out before the Gilford school board this week.

We brought you the story of her father, William Baer, earlier this week. He was appalled that this book was foisted upon his daughter without first getting parental consent. He went over his allotted two minutes speaking time, and the school board had him arrested. He was charged with disorderly conduct, though if you watch the video it’s hard to understand why, and after spending a few hours in jail, will also have to pay a $700 fine.

His daughter, Marina Baer, spoke to the school board this week and what she said was both sincere and important.

Those words “This just shows that you resort to force at the first turn of conflict and I am appalled. So I don’t trust you. And, I honestly don’t feel safe around you people.”

For a former educator, they cut to the quick. Several times each year teachers are evaluated by peers or superiors. On each of the evaluations I have ever had as a public school educator, there was a short section that asked if I made the students feel safe and if I provided a safe and comfortable learning environment.

I felt as though one of the most important jobs I had as a teacher was ensuring the safety of my students – in every way that I could possibly control.

Marina Baer’s curt and heartfelt comments should shame that school board. They have failed to accomplish one of the most important jobs they have – providing a safe and comfortable learning environment.

Each and every student in that district now knows that their school board (meaning the leaders of their schools) are capricious and vindictive. This school board will do whatever it takes to shut down dissent – even if it means having someone arrested for speaking more than two minutes at a public hearing.

They have since apologized.

Shame on you Gilford School Board.

WARNING: Some of the related articles may contain sexually explicit references

Enhanced by Zemanta

Hillary ReDo

Mao Zedong

Mao Zedong (Photo credit: ironmanixs)

Which one is not like the other?

Hillary Clinton in Concord, New Hampshire

Hillary Clinton in Concord, New Hampshire (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Enhanced by Zemanta

Hillsdale College Presents: First Principals On First Fridays

William Hogarth's 1736 engraving, Scholars at ...

Image via Wikipedia

Here’s a title which may attract your attention. If you forget the primary season is well on the way and this lecture was first given on January 6, 2012, you may yet obtain some value from the points given in the lecture.  The questions and the truth has some import in our local election, especially given so many anonymous copies of over-cooked silliness are making their way into the postal boxes of Edgewood residents:

The 2012 Election: America’s Moment of Truth

With the Iowa caucuses slated for January 3, 2012, and the New Hampshire primary scheduled a week thereafter, this presentation will outline what is at stake, and how citizens can understand the political and constitutional issues that will be decided.

This presentation comes in the form of a video lecture and is 66 minutes and 30 seconds long.  Please find the video through the link just below and consider accessing any related articles found afterward.

Click For The Lecture

Related articles

James O’Keefe Seeks Relief — From Big Print Media

Readers will remember Mr. O’Keefe and his work through Project Veritas on discovery of possible voter fraud in New Hampshire during its recent primary to choose a Republican presidential nominee.  If not, it is because the MainScream (MS) media neglected to inform the citizens of the state, much less the nation..

Mr. O’Keefe suffered blogslog slings and arrows, along with verbal barbs from the governor of New Hampshire and other officials of that state.  Comes Mr. O’Keefe with a slingshot of his own in the form of a suit against a New Jersey newspaper

PARAMUS, NEW JERSEY– On New Hampshire Primary Day, Project Veritas, while violating no laws, exposed the ease in which voter fraud can occur in states lacking voter identification requirements.

Project Veritas’ work has been praised by New Hampshire’s legislative leaders, yet the reaction also includes articles by large media organizations that stated false and defamatory statements and articles.

The New Jersey Star-Ledger editorial board reported O’Keefe “committed a felony by fraudulently obtaining a ballot in the name of another person; [broke] New Hampshire law by recording another person.” Additionally the Star-Ledger Editorial board wrote January 22nd, O’Keefe is “still on probation for trying to tap the phone of Sen. Mary Landrieu.  The Star-Ledger had previously printed a retraction for this claim on November 3rd, 2010.

Perhaps there is a lesson for the “intrepid fact gatherers” (meaning the  MS media) hidden in the arrogance of their mantra … perhaps not.  But the result of their jaw-dragging efforts is a joy to see when they are brought to task:

Project Veritas’ president, James O’Keefe commented, “Media outlets obviously intent on protecting a system that fosters voter fraud, have defamed me by claiming I and PV committed voter fraud. The Star-Ledger even went so far as to print a ‘trying to tap phones lie’ after retracting that lie over a year ago, when presented with court documents that proved the contrary.”

“It is my experience that demanding retractions from dishonorable people only leads to dishonorable retractions.  Therefore, today I started a campaign to combat media organizations that state or repeat malicious lies about my work.”

The lawsuit filed this morning against the New Jersey Star Ledger seeks monetary damages and an injunction compelling them to print another retraction with language approved by the court.

To view a copy of the filing, click here.

In New Hampshire Dead People & Zombies May Vote

This came by way of Ralph Hill.  You may want to donate to Project Veritas since progressives hate the organization and the Demos in New Mexico are fighting against Voter ID with all they have:

Dead People Or Zombies Get Ballots In New Hampshire

That’s “Live Free Or Die.” & And vote whether you’re dead or not!.

Do yourself a favor and access the “Related Articles,” found below and especially the last three to hear the progressive and socialist bloggers and those that comment there squeal like a pig caught in a gate.  By the way, their governor recently vetoed a Voter ID bill.  Wonder why — go figure!

Another thing.  I’m surprised Media Matters is so far out this one, but they may show up yet.  Most all of the progressive blogs and their commenters talk about “dumb,” O’Keefe and many purport to know the law in New Hampshire, along with federal law which may apply. We’ll see, I guess, but I have to believe he has someone (perhaps New Hampshire’s AG) protecting his back and that this was a sanctioned undercover investigation.

Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta